MAHARAJ V GONZALES, No. 03-71066 (9th Cir. 2006)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VINODH PARSAD MAHARAJ; SUNITA DEVI MAHARAJ; PREETIKA MAHARAJ; MEENAL MAHARAJ; VINEET MAHARAJ, Petitioners, v. ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent. VINODH PARSAD MAHARAJ; SUNITA DEVI MAHARAJ; PREETIKA MAHARAJ; MEENAL MAHARAJ; VINEET MAHARAJ, Petitioners, v. ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.   No. 03-71066 Agency Nos. A71-788-923 A71-788-924 A72-402-323 A72-402-324 A72-402-325     No. 03-73995 Agency Nos. A71-788-923 A71-788-924 A72-402-323 A72-402-324 A72-402-325 ORDER Filed February 6, 2006 Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge. ORDER Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by 1585 1586 MAHARAJ v. GONZALES the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The threejudge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court. PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2006 Thomson/West.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.