Arkansas Warehouse, Inc. v. Saint-Gobain Ceramic & Plastic, No. 16-4218 (8th Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Court Description: Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Colloton and Gruender, Circuit Judges] Civil case. Affirmed without comment.

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-4218 ___________________________ Arkansas Warehouse, Inc. lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Ft. Smith ____________ Submitted: June 12, 2017 Filed: June 15, 2017 [Unpublished] ____________ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. In this diversity action for unjust enrichment, Arkansas Warehouse, Inc. appeals the district court’s1 grant of for summary judgment to defendant-appellee SaintGobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. After careful de novo review, see Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006), we conclude that the district court’s disposition of the cross-motions for summary judgment was appropriate for the reasons stated its opinion and order. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable P.K. Holmes, III, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas. -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.