Dennis Deters v. Federal Aviation Admin., No. 16-3727 (8th Cir. 2017)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam. Before Wollman, Bowman, and Riley, Circuit Judges] Petition for Review - Federal Aviation Administration. Decision denying medical certificate to re-establish private pilot's license was not arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or without support in the law.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-3727 ___________________________ Dennis Deters lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Federal Aviation Administration lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent ____________ Petition for Review of an Order of the Federal Aviation Administration ____________ Submitted: May 19, 2017 Filed: May 24, 2017 [Unpublished] ____________ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Minnesota resident Dennis Deters petitions this Court for review after the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) denied him a medical certificate needed to re-establish his private pilot’s license. He has also filed a motion to supplement the record. We have reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, and we conclude that the FAA’s decision was not arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or without support in the law. See Reder v. Adm’r of FAA, 116 F.3d 1261, 1263 (8th Cir. 1997) (standard of review). We deny the petition for review and deny as moot Deters’s motion to supplement the record. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
