Charles Swift v. Wadie Thomas, No. 16-3200 (8th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam. Before Wollman, Arnold, and Gruender, Circuit Judges] Civil Case - civil rights. Dismissal is affirmed for the reasons stated by the district court. [ October 19, 2016
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-3200 ___________________________ Charles Swift lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Wadie Thomas; Matthew Kahler lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha ____________ Submitted: October 20, 2016 Filed: October 21, 2016 [Unpublished] ____________ Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Charles Swift appeals after the district court1 dismissed, without prejudice, his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint requesting that the district court impose directions upon a 1 The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska. state-court judge. Upon careful review, and for the reasons stated by the district court, we conclude that the dismissal was proper. See Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) dismissal is reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
