Joe Bandy, III v. Commissioner of Correction, No. 16-2182 (8th Cir. 2017)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Gruender, Arnold and Benton, Circuit Judges Civil case - Civil rights. Defendants' summary judgment affirmed without comment. [ April 20, 2017
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-2182 ___________________________ Joe Henry Bandy, III lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Commissioner of Correction; Jeff Peterson; Craig Oseland lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis ____________ Submitted: April 18, 2017 Filed: April 21, 2017 [Unpublished] ____________ Before GRUENDER, ARNOLD, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Joe Bandy, a civilly committed detainee at the Minnesota Sex Offender Program, appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of judgment on the 1 The Honorable John R. Tunheim, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the district of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Leo I. Brisbois, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. pleadings in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon careful consideration of Mr. Bandy’s appellate arguments and the district court record, see McIvor v. Credit Control Servs., Inc., 773 F.3d 909, 912-13 (8th Cir. 2014) (reviewing de novo grant of judgment on the pleadings), we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
