Maud Opoku-Agyeman v. Loretta E. Lynch, No. 15-2679 (8th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Gruender, Arnold and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] Petition for Review - Immigration. Order denying petitioner's application for cancellation of removal affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 15-2679 ___________________________ Maud Opoku-Agyeman lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General of the United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent ____________ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ____________ Submitted: May 13, 2016 Filed: May 17, 2016 [Unpublished] ____________ Before GRUENDER, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Maud Opoku-Agyeman, a citizen of Ghana, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming an immigration judge’s denial of her application for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1). We conclude that the arguments she presents to this court are unavailing, and thus we deny the petition. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. _______________________
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
