Gosiger, Inc. v. Elliott Aviation, Inc., No. 15-2235 (8th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this CaseGosiger filed suit seeking damages for the diminished value of an aircraft that Elliott damaged. The district court granted summary judgment to Elliott. The court affirmed the district court's ruling that the contract did not allow diminution-in-value damages where Gosiger and Elliott never mutually agreed to modify the Specification Agreement to allow for diminution-in-value damages.
Court Description: Benton, Author, with Murphy and Smith, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Contracts. The parties' contract did not provide for diminution-in-value damages and the district court did not err in granting summary judgment for defendant.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.