Haley Wheeler v. United States, No. 13-3706 (8th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil case - Federal Tort Claims Act. The district court did not err in dismissing plaintiff's FCTA claim for failure to exhaust administrative remedies as plaintiff failed to meet her burden to prove the Army received her claim. [ July 17, 2014
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 13-3706 ___________________________ Haley Wheeler lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Ft. Smith ____________ Submitted: July 16, 2014 Filed: July 18, 2014 [Unpublished] ____________ Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Haley Wheeler appeals the dismissal of her Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The district court1 held that Wheeler 1 The Honorable P.K. Holmes, III, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas. failed to exhaust her administrative remedies, as required by 28 U.S.C. ยง 2675(a). The United States Army, the relevant agency, never received an administrative claim from her. Wheeler argues that the evidence was sufficient to prove the Army received her claim and that the court did not fully develop the record. This court reviews factual jurisdiction attacks for clear error. See Bellecourt v. United States, 994 F.2d 427, 430 (8th Cir. 1993). The district court s findings are not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Black Bear, 542 F.3d 249, 252 (8th Cir. 2008) (under clear-error review, court may reverse only if it has definite and firm conviction that district court was mistaken). Army claims-processors attested that the Army did not receive an administrative claim from Wheeler. The court reasonably concluded that Wheeler s evidence including a telefax-report sheet reflecting that a claim telefaxed to a particular number had been completed left unresolved too many variables as to actual receipt by the proper party. See Bellecourt, 994 F.2d at 430 (presentment of administrative claim is jurisdictional and must be pleaded and proven by FTCA claimant; FTCA conditions will be narrowly construed); Bailey v. United States, 642 F.2d 344, 347 (9th Cir. 1981) (mailing FTCA claim to agency by regular mail, rather than certified or registered mail, did not prove receipt). Wheeler had the burden to prove the Army received her claim and absent such proof, the court lacked jurisdiction. See Mader v. United States, 654 F.3d 794, 807 (8th Cir. 2011) (en banc). The district court did not err by ruling on the evidence before it. See Flores v. United States, 689 F.3d 894, 900 (8th Cir. 2012) (to extent district court must resolve factual disputes to determine jurisdiction, court is free to weigh evidence and satisfy itself as to its power to hear case). The judgment is affirmed. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
