United States v. Hager, No. 12-2074 (8th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this CaseDefendant conditionally pled guilty to recieving and possessing materials involving the sexual exploitation of minors. Defendant appealed the denial of his motion to suppress evidence discovered during a search at his residence pursuant to a warrant. The court concluded that the first search warrant authorized the search of the VHS tapes at issue; was supported by probable cause; even if the search warrant was not supported by probable cause, the evidence gained from the search was admissible pursuant to the Leon good-faith exception; and was not invalidated by an agent's omission. Further, plaintiff's "fruit of the poisonous tree" argument regarding the second warrant also failed. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment.
Court Description: Criminal case - Criminal law. Search and seizure of videotapes did not exceed the scope of the search warrant; affidavit supplied in support of the warrant application established probable cause for search for certain images and metadata as evidence of child pornography crimes; even if the warrant application was defective, the search was valid and the evidence was admissible under the Leon good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule; claim that the warrant application intentionally or recklessly omitted key information rejected.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.