Rancho Holdings v. Tommy Stone, No. 11-3789 (8th Cir. 2012)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil case. Defendants' summary judgment affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 11-3789 ___________________________ Rancho Holdings, LLC lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Manzanillo Associates, LTD; T. F. Stone Companies, Inc. lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants Tommy Fitzgerald Stone, I lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant Bruce Martin Myers lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City ____________ Submitted: October 8, 2012 Filed: October 15, 2012 [Unpublished] ____________ Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Tommy Stone, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in this declaratory judgment action based on a contract dispute.2 Upon careful de novo review, see Eng v. Cummings, McClorey, Davis & Ancho, PLC, 611 F.3d 428, 432 (8th Cir. 2010) (standard of review), we find no basis for reversal, and we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable John T. Maughmer, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(c). 2 As Stone is proceeding pro se on appeal, we note that he represents only himself in this matter. See Rowland v. Cal. Men s Colony, 506 U.S. 194, 201-02 (1993) (corporations, partnerships, or associations cannot appear in federal court other than through licensed attorney). -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
