Sullivan v. Unum Life Ins. Co., et al, No. 11-3711 (8th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this CaseThis appeal arose from a dispute between Unum and the late Kevin Sullivan over long-term disability benefit payments. Sullivan sued Unum, arguing that the termination of his benefits violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1001 et seq., and Unum counterclaimed for overpayment of benefits. The court concluded that it was not an abuse of discretion for the administrator to determine that the large payments that Sullivan received in 2004 were payments for the sale of a business for the purpose of calculating his benefits. Unum asserted that the payments were salary, not income. The court reversed the district court's grant of summary judgment and award of attorney's fees, remanding for consideration of Unum's counterclaims.
Court Description: Civil case - ERISA. It was not an abuse of discretion for the plan administrator to determine that large payments totaling $175,000 which the insured received in 2004 were payments for sale of a business for purposes of calculating his benefits; district court judgment awarding benefits, attorneys' fees and costs to the insured's representative is reversed, and the matter is remanded for consideration of the plan administrator's counterclaims. Judge Bright, dissenting.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.