Leticia Sanders v. Michael J. Astrue, No. 11-2864 (8th Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Court Description: Civil case - Social Security. Denial of supplemental security income benefits affirmed without comment.

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 11-2864 ___________ Leticia Sanders, on behalf of D.S.H., * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Eastern District of Arkansas. * Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, * [UNPUBLISHED] Social Security Administration, * * Appellee. * ___________ Submitted: February 2, 2012 Filed: February 7, 2012 ___________ Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Leticia Sanders, on behalf of her minor daughter D.S.H., appeals the district court s1 order affirming the denial of supplemental security income benefits. Upon de novo review, see Moore ex rel. Moore v. Barnhart, 413 F.3d 718, 721 (8th Cir. 2005), we agree with the district court s reasons for rejecting the arguments Sanders raised below, and we decline to consider the new contentions she raises on appeal, 1 The Honorable Billy Roy Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. see Flynn v. Chater, 107 F.3d 617, 620 (8th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.