United States v. Ray Gibson, No. 15-6122 (6th Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

This opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on November 21, 2016.

Download PDF
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 17a0087p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, > v. RAY GIBSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 15-6122 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky at London. No. 6:14-cr-00025-1—Amul R. Thapar, District Judge. Decided and Filed: April 19, 2017 Before: COLE, Chief Judge; BATCHELDER, MOORE, CLAY, GIBBONS, ROGERS, SUTTON, COOK, McKEAGUE, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE, WHITE, STRANCH, and DONALD, Circuit Judges. _________________ ORDER _________________ A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service has voted for rehearing en banc of this case. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows: The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed, and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.