United States v. Roman, No. 14-4129 (6th Cir. 2015)
Annotate this CaseAgent Seig posed as a father of an 11-year old girl, “Katie,” to respond to a Craigslist.org ad: “I want to be your daddy,” with images of male genitalia. Seig told Roman that he was “active” with his daughter. Roman indicated that he was interested. The men conversed, extensively, by text message, about sexual acts Roman wished to perform and about whether Katie would agree. Seig reassured Roman that was not “the law.” They planned to meet. Seig approached Roman’s vehicle and confirmed that Roman expected to engage in sexual acts with an 11-year old girl. Agents arrested him. Roman’s vehicle was searched. Agents seized Butterfinger candy (identified as Katie’s “fav”), a flower, gum, condoms, and personal lubricant. Roman entered a conditional guilty plea to attempting to use a facility of interstate commerce to knowingly persuade, induce, entice, or coerce a minor to engage in unlawful sexual activity, 18 U.S.C. 2422(b). The Sixth Circuit affirmed, rejecting Lowe’s argument that his conduct was not prohibited because he communicated with an adult intermediary and not a minor. While it is not sufficient to prove that a defendant intended to persuade an adult intermediary to cause a child to engage in sexual activity, the intent to persuade, induce, entice, or coerce a minor exists where the defendant seeks the minor’s assent.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.