Paducah & Louisville Railway, v. Quixx Corporation, et al, No. 07-6429 (6th Cir. 2008)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 08a0596n.06 Filed: October 2, 2008 No. 07-6429 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT PADUCAH & LOUISVILLE RAILWAY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. QUIXX CORPORATION, UTILITY ENGINEERING CORPORATION, and XCEL ENERGY, INC., Defendants-Appellees. _________________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY BEFORE: BOGGS, Chief Judge, GIBBONS, and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. Following an eleven-car derailment, plaintiff railway sued the repair facility that serviced its railcar seven years prior to the accident. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of defendants because it concluded, inter alia, that plaintiffs could not establish that defendants alleged negligence proximately caused the derailment. After reviewing the record, the parties briefs, and the applicable law, we conclude that issuance of a panel opinion would not serve any jurisprudential purpose. Thus, we affirm the district court s well-reasoned decision for the reasons stated in that court s summary judgment opinion and order of September 18, 2007, and its opinion and order of October 29, 2007, denying plaintiff s motion for reconsideration. No. 07-6429 Paducah & Louisville Ry., Inc. V. Quixx Corp. AFFIRMED. -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.