Jones v. Bradshaw, No. 07-3766 (6th Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File No. 15a0085n.06 Case No. 07-3766 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ODRAYE G. JONES, nka Malik Allah-U-Akbar, Petitioner-Appellant, v. MARGARET BRADSHAW, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FILED Jan 28, 2015 DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk ORDER Before: COLE, Chief Judge; MOORE and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges. Odraye G. Jones, an Ohio death row inmate, moves this court to expand its January 30, 2009 order in this capital habeas appeal to allow: (1) the district court to consider Jones’s pro se motions to remove counsel and waive his lethal injection litigation; and (2) the filing and full consideration of further pleadings to demonstrate cause to excuse the procedural default of various ineffective assistance of trial counsel claims under Martinez v. Ryan, 132 S. Ct. 1309 (2012), and Trevino v. Thaler, 133 S. Ct. 1911 (2013). The warden does not oppose Jones’s first motion, and we granted a similar motion on September 6, 2012. We now grant this motion as well. The warden opposes Jones’s second motion, filed through counsel, in which he seeks to supplement or amend his pleadings with claims related to the ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Jones contends that there is cause to excuse the procedural default of those claims Case No. 07-3766 Jones v. Bradshaw under the authority of Martinez and Trevino. Our court has not yet decided whether an Ohio habeas petitioner can show cause to excuse a procedural default under Trevino. See McGuire v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Inst., 738 F.3d 741, 751–52 (6th Cir. 2013). We therefore grant Jones’s second motion to expand the limited remand to allow the filing and full consideration of supplemental or amended pleadings related to the ineffective assistance of trial counsel, and for the district court to consider Jones’s contention that there is cause to excuse the procedural default of those claims under Martinez and Trevino. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.