USA v. Alejandro Garcia-Lozada, No. 16-50922 (5th Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 16-50922 Document: 00514041421 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/20/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 16-50922 Conference Calendar FILED June 20, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ALEJANDRO GARCIA-LOZADA, also known as Alejandro Garcia-Lozado, Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:04-CR-1911-1 Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Alejandro Garcia-Lozada has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garcia-Lozada has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Garcia-Lozada’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 16-50922 Document: 00514041421 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/20/2017 No. 16-50922 appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, Garcia-Lozada’s motion to strike counsel’s brief and proceed pro se is DENIED, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.