Barnett v. Dyncorp Int'l, LLC, No. 15-10757 (5th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this CasePlaintiff filed suit against DyncCorp, alleging that the company failed to give him all of the pay and benefits he was owed for work he did in Kuwait. DynCorp moved to dismiss on the basis of forum non conveniens, arguing that the Foreign Service Agreement’s forum-selection clause mandates that the action be litigated in Kuwait. The district court granted the motion, concluding that the forum-selection clause is valid, enforceable, and requires dismissal under Atlantic Marine Construction Co. v. United States District Court. Under either federal law or Texas’s choice-of-law rules, the court concluded that plaintiff can prevail only if enforcing the parties’ choice of Kuwaiti law and a Kuwaiti forum would contravene a “strong” or “fundamental” public policy of Texas. Because the court concluded that it would not, the court affirmed the judgment.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.