2005 Fourth Circuit US Court of Appeals Case Law

In Re John Ashton Wray, Jr., Appellant
Date: December 29, 2005
Citation: 433 F.3d 376
Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition; Coal River Mountain Watch; Natural Resources Defense Council, Plaintiffs-appellees, v. William Bulen, District Engineer, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District; Robert B. Flowers, Lieutenant General, Chief of Engineers and Commander of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Defendants-appellants, Andwest Virginia Coal Association; Kentucky Coal Association; Ohio Coal Association; Coal Operations and Associates, Incorporated; National Mining Association; Green Valley Coal Company, Intervenors-defendants,consol of Kentucky, Incorporated, Party in Interest.ohio Valley Environmental Coalition; Coal River Mountain Watch; Natural Resources Defense Council, Plaintiffs-appellees, v. West Virginia Coal Association; Kentucky Coal Association; Ohio Coal Association; Coal Operations and Associates, Incorporated; National Mining Association, Intervenors-defendants-appellants, Andwilliam Bulen, District Engineer, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District; Robert B. Flowers, Lieutenant General, Chief of Engineers and Commander of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Defendants,green Valley Coal Company, Intervenor-defendant,consol of Kentucky, Incorporated, Party in Interest.ohio Valley Environmental Coalition; Coal River Mountain Watch; Natural Resources Defense Council, Plaintiffs-appellees, v. Green Valley Coal Company, Intervenor-defendant-appellant, Andwilliam Bulen, District Engineer, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District; Robert B. Flowers, Lieutenant General, Chief of Engineers and Commander of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Defendants,consol of Kentucky, Incorporated, Party in Interest,west Virginia Coal Association; Kentucky Coal Association; Ohio Coal Association; Coal Operations and Associates, Incorporated; National Mining Association, Intervenors-defendants
Date: November 23, 2005
Citation: 429 F.3d 493
In Re Richard Edward Cabey, Movant
Date: November 15, 2005
Citation: 429 F.3d 93
Timothy Cox, Plaintiff-appellant, Andcathy Rider, Plaintiff, v. City of Charleston, South Carolina; Rueben Greenberg, Individually and in His Official Capacity As Chief of Police for the City of Charleston; Joseph Riley, Jr., Individually and in His Official Capacity As Mayor of the City of Charleston; Captain Chin, Individually and in His Official Capacity As an Officer of the Charleston Police Department; Officer Davis, Individually and in His Official Capacity As an Officer of the Charleston Police Department; City of Travelers Rest, South Carolina; Mann Batson, Individually and in His Official Capacity As Mayor of the City of Travelers Rest; Timothy Christy, Individually and in His Official Capacity As Chief of Police for the City of Travelers Rest, Defendants-appellees.timothy Cox, Plaintiff-appellee, Andcathy Rider, Plaintiff, v. City of Travelers Rest, South Carolina; Mann Batson, Individually and in His Official Capacity As Mayor of the City of Travelers Rest; Timothy Christy, Individually and in His Official Capacity As Chief of Police for the City of Travelers Rest, Defendants-appellants, Andcity of Charleston, South Carolina; Rueben Greenberg, Individually and in His Official Capacity As Chief of Police for the City of Charleston; Joseph Riley, Jr., Individually and in His Official Capacity As Mayor of the City of Charleston; Captain Chin, Individually and in His Official Capacity As an Officer of the Charleston Police Department; Officer Davis, Individually and in His Official Capacity As an Officer of the Charleston Police Department, Defendants
Date: July 26, 2005
Citation: 416 F.3d 281
J. Douglas Pinney, M.d.; Patricia S. Colonell, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated; Francis J. Farina, Individually and on Behalf of All Those Similarly Situated; Garrett J. Naquin; Ronald Leblanc; Judith A. Kaufman; Asher Rubenstein; Crystall Gilliam; Dimitri Mack; Riedy Gimpelson, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated; Sarah Dahlgren, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated; Linda Barrell; Blayne Minogue; Brian Lane Barrett; Diana Barrett; David C. Keller; Marsha L. Keller, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Nokia, Incorporated, A/k/a Nokia Mobile Phones, Incorporated, A/k/a Nokia Corporation; Nec America, Incorporated; Ericsson Wireless Communications, Incorporated, A/k/a Ericsson, Incorporated; Sprint Pcs Limited Partnership, A/k/a Sprint Pcs, A/k/a Sprint Spectrum, Llp, A/k/a Sprint Spectrum; Audiovox Communications Corporation; Nextel Communications, Incorporated, A/k/a Nextel Communications of the Mid-atlantic, Incorporated, A/k/a Nextel Partners, Incorporated, A/k/a Nextel; Matsushita Corporation of America, A/k/a Panasonic Corporation; Philips Electronics North America Corporation; Qualcomm Incorporated; Samsung Electronics America, Incorporated, A/k/a Samsung Electronics; Sanyo North America, Incorporated, A/k/a Sanyo Business Systems Corporation, A/k/a Sanyo North America Group; Sony Electronics, Incorporated; at & T Corporation, A/k/a at & T; Verizon Maryland, Incorporated, A/k/a Verizon, A/k/a Verizon Wireless, Formerly Known As Bell Atlantic Maryland, Incorporated; Verizon Communications, Incorporated, Formerly Known As Bell Atlantic Corporation; Verizon Wireless, A/k/a Nynex, A/k/a Bell Atlantic Nynex, A/k/a Bell Atlantic Mobile, Incorporated, A/k/a Bell Atlantic Nynexmobile; Cellco Partnership, D/b/a Verizon Wireless, Formerly Known As Bell Atlantic Nynex Mobile, Formerly Known As Bell Atlantic Mobile; Cingular Wireless, Llc, Formerly Known As Bellsouth Mobility, Incorporated, A/k/a Southwestern Bell Wireless, Formerly Known As Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Incorporated; Cingular Wireless, A/k/a Washington/baltimore Cellular Limited Partnership; Sbc Communications, Incorporated; Cellular One Group, A/k/a Cellular One; Voicestream Wireless Corporation; C.e.i., Incorporated, A/k/a Communications Electronics, A/k/a Communications Electronics, Incorporated; Baltimore Business Communications, Incorporated; Comcast/metrophone; Radiofone; Powertel, Incorporated; Powertel Pcs, Incorporated; Powertel/atlanta, Incorporated; Mitsubishi Wireless Communications, Incorporated; Motorola, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation; Cellular Telecommunications and Internet Association, a District of Columbia Corporation; Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association; Telecommunications Industry Association, A/k/a Tia; Nextel Partners Operating Corporation, Defendants-appellees, Andwestinghouse Communications; Southern Telecom, Incorporated, A/k/a Southern Linc; John Does 1-100; Lgic Corporation; Panasonic Corporation; Samsung Sdi Company; Sanyo Corporation; Sony Corporation; Planet Cellular Communications, Incorporated; Visitor Cellular L.l.c.; Bell South Mobility; Kyocera Wireless Corporation; Mci Worldcom Communications, Incorporated; U.S. West Wireless, L.l.c., a Colorado Corporation; U.S. West Communications, Incorporated, a Colorado Corporation; Gte Mobilnet of San Diego, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation; Gte Wireless San Diego, Llc, a California Limited Liability; Cellular Carriers Association of California, a California Corporation; Ab Cellular Holdings, Llc, D/b/a La Cellular, D/b/a Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Company, Defendants
Date: March 16, 2005
Citation: 402 F.3d 430
No. 04-1138
Date: January 3, 2005
Citation: 393 F.3d 484

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.