Nathaniel Simmons v. Charles Williams, No. 19-6989 (4th Cir. 2019)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6989 NATHANIEL SIMMONS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHARLES WILLIAMS; THOMAS ROBERTSON; ALYSON GLADWELL; STEPHANIE MARSHALL; STANLEY TERRY; CLARISSA JONES; JUANITA MOSS; BELL; MYERS; BEARD; WILLIE F. SMITH; SHERMAN L. ANDERSON; JENNIFER FRANKLIN; SHAKIRA WILLIAMS; MICHELLE CHAMBERS, a/k/a Michelle Chamber; TIM E. ROGERS; DEBORAH RICHTER; VICTORIA NORMAN; ASHLEY MADDOX; CYNTHIA DARDEN; KENNARD DUBOSE; BRYAN P. STIRLING, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (0:19-cv-00317-HMH) Submitted: November 19, 2019 Decided: November 22, 2019 Before WILKINSON and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nathaniel Simmons, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Nathaniel Simmons appeals the district court’s orders adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) civil action for failure to state a claim, denying his motion to amend, and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Simmons v. Williams, No. 0:19-cv-00317-HMH (D.S.C. June 4 & 24, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.