Larry Hamilton, Jr. v. State Commonwealth of Virginia, No. 17-1302 (4th Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1302 LARRY HAMILTON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; L. PENA; STATES ATTORNEY, Jane Doe; JEFF SHEIDON; JAMIE HADDOCK; POLICE OFFICER, John Doe; PRINCE WILLIAMS COUNTY POLICE, Jane Doe Et Al; JOHN DOE; PWDC; GARRET, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-00913-JCC-MSN) Submitted: April 25, 2017 Decided: April 28, 2017 Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry Hamilton, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Notz, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Prince William, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Larry Hamilton, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his amended civil rights complaints with prejudice as incomprehensible and untimely. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Hamilton’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Hamilton has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.