Edward Jeffus v. S. Hollembaek, No. 16-7154 (4th Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7154 EDWARD DANE JEFFUS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. S. HOLLEMBAEK, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (5:15-hc-02240-D) Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward Dane Jeffus, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Edward Dane Jeffus appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from the court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. * reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jeffus Hollembaek, No. 5:15-hc-02240-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 5, 2016). v. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * To the extent that Jeffus appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for failure to prosecute, Jeffus’ claims are rendered moot by the district court’s thorough consideration of his petition in its subsequent order denying Jeffus’ Rule 60(b) motion. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.