US v. James Palmer, No. 16-6918 (4th Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6918 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. JAMES EDDIE PALMER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:93-cr-00090-AWA-2) Submitted: January 6, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harry Dennis Harmon, Jr., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Andrew Curtis Bosse, Darryl James Mitchell, Randy Carl Stoker, Assistant United States Attorneys, V. Kathleen Dougherty, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: James Eddie Palmer appeals the district court’s order denying his motion nunc pro tunc to adjust his sentence pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5G1.3(b). reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Palmer, No. 2:93-cr-00090-AWA-2 (E.D. Va. June 28, 2016). dispense We deny with contentions are the oral motion argument adequately for appointment because presented in the the of counsel and facts and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.