US v. George Howard, No. 16-6380 (4th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6380 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. GEORGE EDWARD HOWARD, June, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (7:13-cr-00020-MGL-1) Submitted: August 18, 2016 Decided: August 23, 2016 Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Edward Howard, Appellant Pro Se. Carrie Fisher Sherard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: George Edward Howard appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider its denial of a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) and Amendment 782 of the Sentencing Guidelines. reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s refusal to reconsider. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 234-36 (4th Cir. 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.