Patricia Leviege v. Vodafone US Inc., No. 16-2413 (4th Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2413 PATRICIA LEVIEGE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. VODAFONE US INC., d/b/a Vodafone Americas, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00374-LMB-IDD) Submitted: May 23, 2017 Decided: May 25, 2017 Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Monique Antonia Miles, OLD TOWNE ASSOCIATES, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Emily Crandall Harlan, NIXON PEABODY LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Patricia Leviege appeals the district court’s orders granting Vodafone US Inc.’s (Vodafone) motion to dismiss Leviege’s employment discrimination, harassment, and retaliation claims against Vodafone, and denying Leviege’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the dismissal order. We have considered the parties’ arguments and have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Leviege v. Vodafone US Inc., No. 1:16-cv00374-LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. Oct. 4, 2016 & Nov. 9, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.