Henrietta Okoro v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 16-2274 (4th Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2274 HENRIETTA OKORO; CYRIACUS OKORO, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE INC.; HUDSON CITY SAVINGS BANK, FSB; M&T BANK; M&T CORPORATION, Successor by merger to Hudson City Savings Bank, FSB and owner of M&T Bank; FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSN.; THE ALBA LAW GROUP, P.A., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:16-cv00616-PX) Submitted: March 27, 2017 Decided: April 7, 2017 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Henrietta Okoro; Cyriacus Okoro, Appellants Pro Se. Douglas Brooks Riley, TREANOR, POPE & HUGHES, PA, Towson, Maryland; David Edwin Solan, BWW LAW GROUP, LLC, Rockville, Maryland; Alvin Frederick, Lauren Elizabeth Marini, ECCLESTON & WOLF, PC, Hanover, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Henrietta Okoro and Cyriacus Okoro court’s order dismissing their complaint. record and find no reversible error. substantially for the reasons stated appeal the district We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm by the district court. Okoro v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 8:16-cv-00616-PX (D. Md. filed Oct. 6, 2016 & entered Oct. 7, 2016). oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before We dispense with contentions this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.