Glynndeavin von Fox v. The State of South Carolina, No. 16-1265 (4th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1265 GLYNNDEAVIN VON FOX, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendant - Appellee. No. 16-1272 GLYNNDEAVIN VON FOX, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; SOUTH CAROLINA GOVERNOR NIKKI HALEY, Defendants - Appellees. No. 16-1276 GLYNNDEAVIN VON FOX, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendant - Appellee. No. 16-1312 GLYNNDEAVIN VON FOX, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY, Defendant - Appellee. No. 16-1313 GLYNNDEAVIN VON FOX, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARKET STREET PAVILION HOTEL, Defendant - Appellee. No. 16-1314 GLYNNDEAVIN VON FOX, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. 2 COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON, Defendant - Appellee. No. 16-1315 GLYNNDEAVIN VON FOX, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RITZ CARLTON CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee. No. 16-1316 GLYNNDEAVIN VON FOX, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JAPAN, The Sovereign Country of, Defendant - Appellee. No. 16-1333 GLYNNDEAVIN VON FOX, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. 3 PRENNER & MARVEL PA; STATE DEPARTMENT OF THE US, The; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, The, Defendants - Appellees. No. 16-1334 GLYNNDEAVIN VON FOX, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF CHARLESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant - Appellee. No. 16-1335 GLYNNDEAVIN VON FOX, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA, The State of; SOLICITOR SCARLETT A WILSON, Defendants - Appellees. No. 16-1336 GLYNNDEAVIN VON FOX, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. 4 US STATE DEPARTMENT, The, Defendant - Appellee. No. 16-1337 GLYNNDEAVIN VON FOX, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLESTON COUNTY CLERK OF COURT, Defendants - Appellees. No. 16-1338 GLYNNDEAVIN VON FOX, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHARLESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant - Appellee. No. 16-1339 GLYNNDEAVIN VON FOX, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. 5 SOUTH CAROLINA, State of, Defendant - Appellee. No. 16-1340 GLYNNDEAVIN VON FOX, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR MARISA NAVA, Ph.D., Defendant - Appellee. No. 16-1342 GLYNNDEAVIN VON FOX, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SAVAGE LAW FIRM, Defendant - Appellee. No. 16-1343 GLYNNDEAVIN VON FOX, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. 6 L. RANDOLPH WAID, Ph.D., Defendant - Appellee. No. 16-1344 GLYNNDEAVIN VON FOX, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GROVER BEAU SEATON, Esq.; B. J. BILTON, Paralegal; RACHEL MCKEIN, Esq.; SEATON LAW FIRM, Defendants - Appellees. No. 16-1345 GLYNNDEAVIN VON FOX, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KEEFER & KEEFER LLC, Defendant - Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard M, Gergel, District Judge. (2:16-cv-00106-RMG; 2:16-cv-00132-RMG; 2:16-cv-00179-RMG; 2:16cv-00097-RMG; 2:16-cv-00187-RMG; 2:16-cv-00188-RMG; 2:16-cv00186-RMG; 2:16-cv-00225-RMG; 2:16-cv-00184-RMG; 2:16-cv-00098RMG; 2:16-cv-00227-RMG; 2:16-cv-00185-RMG; 2:16-cv-00131-RMG; 2:16-cv-00136-RMG; 2:16-cv-00228-RMG; 2:16-cv-00394-RMG; 2:16-cv00180-RMG; 2:16-cv-00181-RMG; 2:16-cv-00182-RMG; 2:16-cv-00183RMG) 7 Submitted: August 16, 2016 Decided: August 24, 2016 Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Glynndeavin von Fox, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 8 PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Glynndeavin von Fox appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and dismissing each case without prejudice for failing to state a claim. no reversible error. We have reviewed the records and find Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals for the reasons stated by the district court. von Fox v. South Carolina, No. 2:16-cv-00106- RMG (D.S.C. Feb. 19, 2016); von Fox v. South Carolina, No. 2:16cv-00132-RMG (D.S.C. Feb. 29, 2016); von Fox v. Med. Univ. of S.C., No. 2:16-cv-00179-RMG (D.S.C. Feb. 19, 2016); von Fox v. Ariz. State Univ., No. 2:16-cv-00097-RMG (D.S.C. Mar. 7, 2016); von Fox v. Market St. Pavilion Hotel, No. 2:16-cv-00187-RMG (D.S.C. Mar. 10, 2016); von Fox v. Coll. of Charleston, No. 2:16-cv-00188-RMG (D.S.C. Mar. 10, 2016); von Fox v. Ritz Carlton Corp., No. 2:16cv-00186-RMG (D.S.C. Mar. 10, 2016); von Fox v. Japan, No. 2:16cv-00225-RMG (D.S.C. Mar. 7, 2016); von Fox v. Prenner & Marvel PA, No. 2:16-cv-00184-RMG (D.S.C. Mar. 10, 2016); von Fox v. City of Charleston Police Dep’t, No. 2:16-cv-00098-RMG (D.S.C. Mar. 7, 2016); von Fox v. South Carolina, No. 2:16-cv-00227-RMG (D.S.C. Mar. 10, 2016); von Fox v. U.S. State Dep’t, No. 2:16-cv-00185RMG (D.S.C. Mar. 10, 2016); von Fox v. South Carolina, No. 2:16cv-00131-RMG (D.S.C. Mar. 7, 2016); von Fox v. Charleston Police Dep’t, No. 2:16-cv-00136-RMG (D.S.C. Mar. 7, 2016); von Fox v. 9 South Carolina, No. 2:16-cv-00228-RMG (D.S.C. Mar. 10, 2016); von Fox v. Nava, No. 2:16-cv-00394-RMG (D.S.C. Mar. 10, 2016); von Fox v. Savage Law Firm, No. 2:16-cv-00180-RMG (D.S.C. Mar. 10, 2016); von Fox v. Waid, No. 2:16-cv-00181-RMG (D.S.C. Mar. 10, 2016); von Fox v. Seaton Law Firm, No. 2:16-cv-00182-RMG (D.S.C. Mar. 10, 2016); von Fox v. Keefer & Keefer, No. 2:16-cv-00183-RMG (D.S.C. Mar. 10, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 10

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.