Unula Abebe v. Maurice Green, No. 14-7292 (4th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7292 UNULA BOO SHAWN ABEBE, a/k/a Unula B Abebe, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MAURICE GREEN; LIEUTENANT SCOTT; KAREN MCCULLOUGH; SHARONDA SUTTON; LIEUTENANT HUDSON; KENNETH PARKER; ROBERT STEVENSON; LULA JOHNSON; AL WALKER; NURSE JOHNSON; LIEUTENANT S. JACKSON; PERCY JONES; LIEUTENANT CARTER; WILLIE SIMMONS, Defendants - Appellees, and SOUTH CAROLINA; SERGEANT DEVON SCOTT; SERGEANT FOGAL; SERGEANT H. WRIGHT; SERGEANT J. C. WILLIAMS; SERGEANT GLASS; SERGEANT OAKMAN; SERGEANT R. JONES; LIEUTENANT FALEY; CORPORAL FURGAL; CORPORAL DOOLEY; CORPORAL COREY BECKETT; LARRY CATLIDGE; JERMAINE MCCOY; JOHN ENGLISH; CLIFTON DAVENPORT; M. BRADY; OFFICER MCDANIELS; OFFICER COX; OFFICER STONE; OFFICER SOREZ; OFFICER ROBERTS; OFFICER BROWN; JOHN IRMO; J. DIXON; T. EDMOND; CORPORAL MANLEY; OFFICER HAMLETON; OFFICER MOSES; ROSELYN ELERBY; ANN HALLMAN; INVESTIGATOR HURT; SERGEANT ESTERLINE; OFFICER WILLIAMS; LIEUTENANT R. JEFFERSON; AARON WILSON; OFFICER FANT; OFC HARDY; OFC GRITTLE; OFFICER MS. COOK; OFFICER MR. COOK; OFC DICKSON; DOCTOR JOHN B. TOMARCHIO; WILLIAM BYARS; LIEUTENANT T. JOHNSON, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (5:11-cv-02750-RMG) Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 23, 2014 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unula Boo Shawn Abebe, Appellant Pro Se. Sheila M. Bias, Drew Hamilton Butler, Caleb Martin Riser, RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN & ROBINSON, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Unula order Boo dismissing Shawn his 42 Abebe appeals the district U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) court’s complaint for failure to comply with the court’s discovery order under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2) and 41(b). We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, no reversible error. reasons stated by the district court. cv-02750-RMG (D.S.C. July 30, 2014). we affirm for the Abebe v. Green, No. 5:11We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.