Mark Corrigan v. Ms. Atkins, No. 13-7183 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7183 MARK R. CORRIGAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MS. ATKINS; MS. BOLLOT; DOCTOR CERVI; PITT COUNTY; WILSON COUNTY; SARGEANT CLIFFORD BAILEY; OFFICER JESSIE BARNES; HOWARD ADAMS; DIANA CARMACK; KATHARINA DEWALD, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:98-ct-00667-BR) Submitted: November 19, 2013 Before WYNN and Circuit Judge. FLOYD, Circuit Decided: November 22, 2013 Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark R. Corrigan, Appellant Pro Se. Tommy Willis Jarrett, DEES, SMITH, POWELL, JARRETT, DEES & JONES, Goldsboro, North Carolina; Francisco Joseph Benzoni, John D. Madden, SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Julie Baxter Bradburn, Kristen Yarbrough Riggs, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; Dieter Mauch, HEDRICK, MURRAY, BRYSON, KENNETT, MAUCH & CONNOR, PLLC, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Mark R. Corrigan appeals the district court s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3) motion for reconsideration of the court s 2002 order granting Appellees motion for summary judgment and action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. dismissing Corrigan s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) district Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the court. Corrigan (E.D.N.C. July 9, 2013). v. Atkins, No. 5:98-ct-00667-BR We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.