Wei Weng v. Eric Holder, Jr., No. 13-2273 (4th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2273 WEI WEI WENG, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. States, HOLDER, JR., Attorney General for the United Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: July 22, 2014 Decided: August 18, 2014 Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Oleh R. Tustaniwsky, Brooklyn, New York, for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Attorney General, Cindy S. Ferrier, Assistant Director, Brendan P. Hogan, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Wei Wei Wang, a native and citizen of the People s Republic of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing her appeal from the Immigration asylum, Judge s withholding (IJ) of decision removal Convention Against Torture. denying and her requests protection under for the We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of Weng s merits hearing and her supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative findings of fact, see 8 U.S.C. ยง 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence supports the Board s decision to uphold the IJ s denial of Weng s applications for relief. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). See INS v. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Wei Wei Weng (B.I.A. Nov. 14, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.