Clarence Johnson v. Wells Fargo, No. 13-1551 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1551 CLARENCE D. JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:13-cv-00419-LMB-IDD) Submitted: June 24, 2013 Decided: July 12, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clarence D. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Clarence D. Johnson appeals the district court s order dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Johnson v. Wells Fargo, No. 1:13-cv-00419- LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. Apr. 10, 2013). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.