Franklin Smith v. Corporal Baldwin, No. 12-6845 (4th Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6845 FRANKLIN C. SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CORPORAL BALDWIN, corporal-morning shift (8:00 to 6:00 p.m.); MR. WILLIAMS, Classification Officer, Bankers hours; MR. STEWART, Counselor and Classification Officer, Bankers hours; RODNEY L. JACKSON; LT. STEVEN P. GALLAGHER; SERGEANT SMITH, Sergeant at Norfolk City Jail; CAPTAIN BACON, Captain at Norfolk City Jail; CAPTAIN MOORE, Captain at Norfolk City Jail; CORPORAL MCCARTHY, Corporal at Norfolk City Jail; DEPUTY WILLOUGHBY, Deputy at Norfolk City Jail; MS. GREEN, Mental Health Dept.; MR. GULTEREZ, Mental Health Dept.; DEPUTY INVENTO, Deputy; UNKNOWN DEPUTY WITH RIFLE, Deputy, Defendants Appellees, and ROBERT J. MCCABE, Sheriff over the Norfolk City Jail, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:10-cv-00033-MSD-DEM) Submitted: June 14, 2012 Decided: June 20, 2012 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Franklin C. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa H. Leiner, HARMAN, CLAYTOR, CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Franklin C. Smith appeals the district court s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. have reviewed the record Accordingly, although we pauperis, affirm court. we grant the find no reversible leave to proceed reasons stated by error. in the forma district Smith v. Baldwin, No. 2:10-cv-00033-MSD-DEM (E.D. Va. Apr. 26, 2012). facts for and We and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately the and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.