Jorge Gevara v. Betty Inpold, No. 11-6279 (4th Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6279 JORGE GEVARA, a/k/a Jorge Galeas, Plaintiff Appellant, v. BETTY INPOLD, Defendant Appellee, and ALVIN WILLIAM KELLER, JR.; ROBERT C. LEWIS; RICHARD NEELY; LAWRENCE PARSONS; JEFFREY T. SMITH; JUDY ATWATER; DENNIS E. MARSHALL; D. HOUSE; J. HYATT; E. COLEMAN, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:10-cv-00454-RJC) Submitted: May 19, 2011 Before TRAXLER, Judges. Chief Decided: Judge, and AGEE Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jorge Gevara, Appellant Pro Se. and May 24, 2011 KEENAN, Circuit Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Jorge Gevara seeks to appeal the district court s order denying his motions for reconsideration and leave to amend his complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. 545-47 (1949). Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, The order Gevara seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. dispense with oral argument because the facts and We legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.