Angelo Ham v. Jon Ozmint, No. 10-7216 (4th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7216 ANGELO B. HAM, a/k/a Angelo Bernard Ham, Plaintiff Appellant, v. JON OZMINT; ANTHONY J. PADULA; JOHN J. BROOKS; BRUCE OBERMAN; RONNIE CRIBB; DARRYL CAIN, Sergeant of SMU at L.C.I.; CHRISTOPHER GODFREY, Officer of SMU at L.C.I., Defendants Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, Chief District Judge. (6:10-cv-01095-DCN-KFM) Submitted: December 16, 2010 Decided: December 28, 2010 Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Angelo B. Ham, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Barry Johnson, LEE ERTER WILSON HOLLER & SMITH, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Angelo interlocutory magistrate error. 129 S. Ct. order judge injunction. * See B. and Ham appeals accepting denying the Ham s the district recommendation motion for a court s of the preliminary We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Winter 365, 374 v. Natural (2008). Res. Def. Accordingly, reasons stated by the district court. we Council, affirm Inc., for the Ham v. Ozmint, No. 6:10- cv-01095-DCN-KFM (D.S.C. Aug. 23, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * We have jurisdiction over this appeal from an interlocutory order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1) (2006). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.