Michael Sindram v. City of Takoma Park Pol Dept, No. 10-2090 (4th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-2090 MICHAEL SINDRAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF TAKOMA PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT; K. GODELEWSKI; MR. WOLFF, #8352; TERRY JOHNSSON, GILBERT; MR. Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:10-cv-00681-PJM) Submitted: November 18, 2010 Before SHEDD and Circuit Judge. AGEE, Circuit Decided: Judges, and November 24, 2010 HAMILTON, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Sindram, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michael Sindram appeals a district court order denying his motion for clarification and modification of order and for related relief, which was construed by the district court as a motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court s order and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sindram v. City of Takoma Park Police, No. 8:10-cv-00681-PJM (D. Md. Aug. 19, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.