Robert Hendricks v. Robert Stepp, No. 10-1590 (4th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1590 ROBERT MASON HENDRICKS; JACQUELINE TAYLOR HENDRICKS, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. ROBERT STEPP, Esquire; RHONDA HUNSINGER; JEANNIE WEINGARTH; MICHAEL TAYLOR, MAURICE HOOD; Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:08-cv-03299-CMC) Submitted: December 10, 2010 Decided: December 30, 2010 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Mason Hendricks, Jacqueline Taylor Hendricks, Appellants Pro Se. Mark S. Barrow, William R. Calhoun, Jr., SWEENY, WINGATE & BARROW, PA, Columbia, South Carolina; Katherine Dudley Helms, Christopher John Near, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Columbia, South Carolina; Janet Brooks Holmes, Daniel Roy Settana, Jr., MCKAY, CAUTHEN, SETTANA & STUBLEY, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Robert Hendricks and Jacqueline Hendricks appeal the district court s order denying relief on their Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to vacate the district dismissal of their civil action. court s July 22, 2009 After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Appellants motion. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b); MLC Auto., LLC v. Town of S. Pines, 532 F.3d 269, 277 (4th Cir. 2008); Heyman v. M.L. Mktg. Co., 116 F.3d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions the court we affirm the are adequately and argument judgment presented would not of in aid the the the district materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.