Chander Kant v. Jay Cohen, No. 10-1054 (4th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1054 CHANDER KANT; ASHIMA K. KANT, Plaintiffs Appellants, v. JAY L. COHEN, Defendant Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:08cv-00318-RWT) Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: November 22, 2010 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Chander Kant, Ashima K. Kant, Appellants Pro Se. Deborah Murrell Whelihan, JORDAN, COYNE & SAVITS, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Chander Kant and Ashima K. Kant appeal the district court s orders granting the Defendant s motion for judgment and denying their motion for reconsideration. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. summary We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kant v. Cohen, No. 8:08-cv-00318-RWT (D. Md. Dec. 11, 2009; Oct. 14, 2009). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.