US v. Nathan Foster, No. 09-8072 (4th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-8072 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. NATHAN LEE FOSTER, a/k/a Plum, Defendant Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:03-cr-00319-F-1) Submitted: October 21, 2010 Decided: November 12, 2010 Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nathan Lee Foster, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Nathan Lee Foster appeals the district court s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Foster, No. 5:03-cr-00319-F-1 (E.D.N.C. July 17, 2009). We deny Foster s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions the court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.