US v. Randolf Moore, No. 09-7792 (4th Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7792 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RANDOLF MOORE, a/k/a Randy, a/k/a Booney, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (4:95-cr-00041-H-7) Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 25, 2009 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randolf Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Randolf Moore appeals the district court s order denying his motion to reconsider the district court s previous order denying his motion to supplement. record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Moore, No. 4:95-cr-00041-H-7 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 6, 2009). Moore s motion dispense with for oral transcript argument at government because the We deny expense, facts and and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.