US v. Reginald Stowe, No. 09-7492 (4th Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7492 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. REGINALD JEROME STOWE, Defendant Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:96-cr-00046-FDW-1) Submitted: September 28, 2009 Decided: October 7, 2009 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Reginald Jerome Stowe, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Reginald Jerome Stowe appeals the district court s orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), and his post-judgment motion. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Stowe, No. 3:96-cr-00046-FDW-1 (W.D.N.C. July 21 & 31, 2009). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.