Mountaga Bah v. Wells Fargo Bank NA, No. 09-2217 (4th Cir. 2010)
Annotate this Case
The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on June 10, 2014.
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2217 MICHELLE JOHNSON BAH; MOUNTAGA BAH, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. WELLS FARGO BANK NA, Defendant Appellee, and HSBC BANK USA; DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY; REAL TIME RESOLUTIONS, INCORPORATED; WELLS FARGO BANK WEST N.A.; HUD, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:08cv-03429-RWT) Submitted: December 9, 2010 Decided: December 22, 2010 Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mary E. Goulet, WHITHAM, CURTIS, CHRISTOFFERSON & COOK, P.C., Reston, Virginia, for Appellants. Amy S. Owen, Elizabeth S. Finberg, COCHRAN & OWEN, L.L.C., Vienna, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michelle Johnson Bah and Mountaga Bah appeal from the district court s order dismissing their civil action, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), in which they sought to prevent foreclosure proceedings against their home. the record error. and the parties briefs, and We have reviewed find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bah v. Wells Fargo Bank NA, No. 8:08-cv-03429- RWT (D. Md. Sept. 23, 2009). We deny the Appellee s motion to strike and for sanctions, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
