US v. Anthony Ross, No. 08-8006 (4th Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-8006 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANTHONY EARL ROSS, a/k/a Bam, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:02-cr-00336-RLW-1) Submitted: March 23, 2009 Decided: April 6, 2009 Before MICHAEL and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Stefan Nachmanoff, Federal Public Defender, Alexandria, Virginia; Robert James Wagner, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Stephen David Schiller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Anthony Earl Ross appeals the district court s order denying his motion for reduction U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). no reversible error. of sentence pursuant to 18 We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Ross, No. 3:02- cr-00336-RLW-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 21, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.