US v. Kali Hill, No. 08-6818 (4th Cir. 2009)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on March 4, 2009.
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6818 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KALI A. HILL, a/k/a Eldridge L. Hill, a/k/a Kali, a/k/a Fly, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (2:03-cr-00162-PMD-1) Submitted: August 24, 2009 Decided: October 5, 2009 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kali A. Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Thomas Phillips, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Kali A. Hill appeals the district court s order summarily denying his motion to clarify the presentence report. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. error. See United States v. Hill, No. 2:03-cr-00162-PMD-1 (D.S.C. May 1, 2008). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
