US v. Kashawn Marrow, No. 08-6551 (4th Cir. 2008)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6551 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. KASHAWN DARNELL MARROW, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (4:07-cr-00008-JBF-TEM-1) Submitted: November 13, 2008 Decided: November 19, 2008 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kashawn Darnell Marrow, Appellant Pro Se. Howard Jacob Zlotnick, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Kashawn Darnell Marrow appeals the district order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. court s We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Marrow, No. 4:07-cr-00008-JBF-TEM-1 (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 27, 2008 & entered Mar. 28, 2008). In his informal brief, Marrow seeks to raise new Guidelines amendments, effective after the date of the district court s order. opinion on the applicability of the While we express no amendments to Marrow s sentence, our decision is without prejudice to Marrow filing another motion regarding the new amendments. motion for appointment of counsel. We We deny Marrow s dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.