Tommy Farrar v. Lt. Hodge, No. 07-7785 (4th Cir. 2008)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7785 TOMMY FARRAR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LT. HODGE; OFFICER ELLIS; OFFICER CURTIS; LIEUTENANT ALFORD; LIEUTENANT MERIDITH; SERGEANT MCCORMICK; OFFICER DIPONTE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:06-ct-03079-D) Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: September 10, 2008 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN,* Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tommy Farrar, Appellant Pro Se. John A. Maxfield, COUNTY ATTORNEY S OFFICE FOR THE COUNTY OF WAKE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. * Judge Duncan did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). PER CURIAM: Tommy Farrar appeals the district court s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 5:06-ct-03079-D (E.D.N.C. Nov. 27, 2007). We have reviewed Farrar v. Hodge, No. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.