Duncan v. Solomon, No. 06-6824 (4th Cir. 2006)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6824 WILLIAM DUNCAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus L. M. SOLOMON; J. N. VAUGHAN; WILLIAM CARROLL, JR.; W. C VINSON; B. COTTON; D. GLOVER, Lt.; D. FUTRELL, Lt.; REGINALD E. MIDGETTE, Rev.; LUCIEN CAPONE, III; JAMES C. JOHNSON; LUNSFORD LONG; MATTHEW ROUSE, JR.; N. M. JAMES; GEROTHA R. SPAIN; R. R. MEWBORN; BOYD BENNETT; CHARLES STEVENS, Manager; R. C. KING; C. EDWARDS; GWEN NORVILLE; JAMES BARBER; VICTORIA HUNT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:06-ct-03001-H) Submitted: September 28, 2006 Decided: October 10, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Duncan, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: William Duncan appeals the district court s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (2000) complaint. the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Duncan v. Solomon, No. 5:06-ct-03001-H (E.D.N.C. Apr. 19, 2006). We dispense with oral contentions argument because the facts and legal are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.