Clay v. Stophel, No. 06-6721 (4th Cir. 2006)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6721 MAURICE OAKLEY CLAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ANN STOPHEL, sued in her individual capacity; DOCTOR WRAY, sued in his individual capacity; J. L. GOWAN, M.D., sued in his individual and official capacity, Defendants - Appellees, and MIKE SALYER, sued in his individual capacity; DOCTOR OHAI, sued in his individual capacity, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, Jr., District Judge. (2:04-cv-00590-WDK) Submitted: November 3, 2006 Decided: November 21, 2006 Before MICHAEL, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Maurice Oakley Clay, Appellant Pro Se. Henry Smith Keuling-Stout, KEULING-STOUT, PC, Big Stone Gap, Virginia; Samuel Lawrence Dumville, NORRIS & ST. CLAIR, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Coreen Antoinette Bromfield, RAWLS & MCNELIS, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Maurice Oakley Clay appeals the district court s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clay v. Stophel, No. 2:04-cv-00590-WDK (E.D. Va. Mar. 22, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.