Floyd v. Nationwide Mutual, No. 06-1722 (4th Cir. 2007)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1722 DARLA R. FLOYD; DANA NICHOLE FLOYD, Plaintiffs - Appellees, versus NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (6:04-cv-01305-GRA) Submitted: March 2, 2007 Decided: March 13, 2007 Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John R. Murphy, Adam J. Neil, MURPHY & GRANTLAND, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. John Shannon Nichols, BLUESTEIN & NICHOLS, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina; Bryan D. Ramey, BRYAN D. RAMEY & ASSOCIATES, Piedmont, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company appeals the district court s order reforming Darla Floyd s insurance policy to include underinsured motorist coverage and allowing Floyd to stack the coverage on her vehicles. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Floyd v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., No. 6:04- cv-01305-GRA (D.S.C. May 18, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.