Tjhang v. Gonzales, No. 06-1286 (4th Cir. 2006)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1286 ANDY ALEXANDER TJHANG, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A79-342-411) Submitted: October 27, 2006 Decided: November 29, 2006 Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Matthew W. Rau, LAW OFFICE OF MATTHEW W. RAU, Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Allen F. Loucks, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Andy Alexander Tjhang, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ( Board ) denying his motion to reconsider its prior order, which adopted and affirmed the immigration judge s denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed the record and the Board s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2006); Jean v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 475, 481 (4th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. (B.I.A. Feb. 7, 2006). facts and materials legal before See In re: Tjhang, No. A79-342-411 We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately the and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.