Trinity Wall Street v. WalMart Stores Inc, No. 14-4764 (3d Cir. 2015)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________________ No. 14-4764 ________________ TRINITY WALL STREET v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Appellant ________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (D.C. Civil Action No. 1-14-cv-00405) District Judge: Honorable Leonard P. Stark ________________ Present: AMBRO, VANASKIE, and SHWARTZ, Circuit Judges ORDER Appellant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. filed a notice of appeal on December 16, 2014 from both the District Court’s December 8, 2014 order (1) granting Appellee Trinity Wall Street’s motion for summary judgment with respect to Count I of the Verified Amended Complaint and (2) entering a permanent injunction against Wal-Mart from excluding Trinity’s Proposal from its 2015 proxy materials. It is hereby ORDERED that: The District Court order entered on December 8, 2014 granting Appellee’s motion for summary judgment with respect to Count I of the Verified Amended Complaint is reversed and the permanent injunction it entered is vacated.1 Because the District Court’s entry of judgment against Trinity on Count II of the Verified Amended Complaint is not before us, we do not address the Court’s disposition of that Count. 1 Consequently, Wal-Mart may exclude Trinity’s Proposal from its 2015 proxy materials. The Court will issue an Opinion in this matter at a later time. The mandate will issue forthwith. By the Court, s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge Dated: April 14,2 015 CLW/cc: Christopher M. Foulds, Esq. Joel E. Friedlander, Esq. Theodore J. Boutrous, Esq. Adam H. Offenhartz, Esq. Philip A. Rovner, Esq. Angela C. Whitesell, Esq. Aric H. Wu, Esq. Robert A. Long, Jr., Esq. Cory L. Andrews, Esq. Robert A. Long, Jr., Esq. Maureen Barden, Esq. Richard L. Wyatt, Esq. William B. Chandler, III, Esq. Paul J. Lockwood, Esq. Roland P. Bissell, Esq. Jeffrey W. Golan, Esq. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.